Originally, my plan was to write about Hurricane Carlotta,
which struck Puerto Escondido on Friday, and brought a great deal of rain to
the city of Oaxaca. However, an article in the New York Times regarding
Mexico's economy turned my mind in another direction.
Photo Credit: Mexico Today |
This past Monday and Tuesday, President Filipe CaderĂ³n, in
Los Cabos, hosted the G-20 countries. Seventeen years of macroeconomic
stability, low inflation, manageable debt and an open economy, so it was
reported, helped Mexico move ahead of Brazil to become Latin America's fastest
growing economy.
In recent years, Brazil was portrayed as a nation headed for
greatness, while Mexico appeared trapped in its bloody war on drugs. One would
tend to believe Brazil safer. However, Brazil's homicide rate tops Mexico's.
The particularly brutal killings and the involvement of the army draws
attention to Mexico's plight.
Mexico competes with China, meaning it is an exporter of
manufactured goods, such as computers, televisions, and automobiles, exporting
78 percent into the United States. Its an economy that welcomes foreign
investment, which more often than not means United States companies moving
their plants south in search of cheaper labor.
Although I'm delighted that Mexico is doing well, it’s the
same old story. Multi-nationals move their production plants to where labor is
cheaper, and export the products made to affluent parts of the world, which of
course means, more often than not, the United States.
If Mexico progresses, collects more taxes to create a
sounder infrastructure, improves labor laws and unions succeed in ensuring the
people receive a fair deal, will the economy fare so well? Should the economy
depend so heavily on exports to the United States? How long can American
consumer continue to buy products when they no longer have jobs and their
credit has run out?
No comments:
Post a Comment